Today, the ship kinetic energy and structural crushing resistance is not taken into account in any regulation concerned with the damaged state of a conventional ship (damage stability, oil outflow, etc.). However, the past few years of experience with high-speed craft (HSC) have clearly demonstrated that impact damage is indeed related to the kinetic energy and the strength of the ship. The present paper discusses various aspects related to rational design against grounding accidents. A relatively simple theory is reviewed for comparing the expected grounding damage of different ships, taking into account the structure, the displacement and the sailing velocity. It is shown that based on simple requirements of similitude, it is possible to scale certain types of grounding bottom damage. Then 130 grounding accidents are investigated. Attempts are first made at identifying the governing grounding scenarios and deriving a formula for the relation between the volume of deformed structure and the energy absorption (like the Minorsky formula). Moreover, the damage statistics is used to illustrate that the damage length divided by ship length is a function of the ship size. This observation is not in agreement with current regulations where bottom damage is proportional to ship length. The scaling theory is then used to explain that large ships experience longer relative damages than small ships. Major conclusions of the study are that the quality of future damage records should be improved, that various requirements and rules involving bottom damage may need to be revised, and that a method has been proposed for ranking ships according to their crashworthiness in grounding accidents. [S0892-7219(00)00103-5]

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
ships, accidents, statistical analysis, design for manufacture, naval engineering
Topics:
Accidents, Damage, Ships, Statistics
1.
Akita
,
Y.
,
Ando
,
N.
,
Fujita
,
Y.
, and
Kitamura
,
K.
,
1972
, “
Studies on Collision-Protective Structures in Nuclear-Powered Ships
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
19
, p.
365
365
.
2.
Vaughan
,
H.
,
1978
, “
Bending and Tearing of Plate With Application to Ship Bottom Damage
,”
Naval Arch.
,
3
, May, pp.
97
–
99
.
3.
Rodd, J. L., 1996, “Observations on Conventional and Advanced Double Hull Grounding Experiments,” Int. Conf. on Designs and Methodologies for Collision and Grounding Protection of Ships, San Francisco, CA, pp. 13.1–13.13.
4.
ASIS, 1995, “Large Scale Grounding Tests and Numerical Simulation,” Technical Report, The Association for Structural Improvement of Shipbuilding Industry, IMO Information Paper.
5.
Pedersen
,
P. Terndrup
,
1994
, “
Ship Grounding and Hull Girder Strength
,”
Marine Struct.
,
7
, pp.
1
–
29
.
6.
Simonsen, B. C., and Ottesen Hansen, N. E., 1998, “Protection of Marine Structures by Artificial Islands,” Proc. International Symposium on Advances in Ship Collision Analysis, Lyngby, Denmark.
7.
Amdahl, J., and Kavlie, D., 1992, “Experimental and Numerical Simulation of Double Hull Stranding,” DNV-MIT Workshop on Mechanics of Ship Collision and Grounding, 1, Ed. O. Astrup.
8.
Amdahl, J., Kavlie, D., and Johansen, A., 1995, “Tanker Grounding Resistance,” Proc. Sixth International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Mobile Units, (PRADS95), Seoul, Korea, pp. 2.1072–2.1083.
9.
Rawson, C., and Brown, A., 1998, “A Probabilistic Assessment of Ship Damage in Grounding Events,” Technical Report 61, Joint MIT-Industry Program on Tanker Safety, May.
10.
Simonsen, B. C., 1999, “Bottom Raking Damage to High-Speed Craft,” IMO Information Paper, presented at RINA Spring Meeting, accepted for publication, RINA Transactions.
11.
Lu
,
G.
, and
Calladine
,
C. R.
,
1990
, “
On the Cutting of a Plate by a Wedge
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
,
32
, pp.
295
–
313
.
12.
Simonsen
,
B. C.
, and
Wierzbicki
,
T.
,
1997
, “
Plasticity, Fracture and Friction in Steady State Plate Cutting
,”
Int. J. Impact Eng.
,
19
, No.
8
, pp.
667
–
691
.
13.
Thomas, P. F., 1992, “Application of Plate Cutting Mechanics to Damage Prediction in Ship Grounding,” Joint MIT-Industry Project on Tanker Safety, Technical Report 8, May.
14.
Wang
,
G.
,
Ohtsubo
,
H.
, and
Liu
,
D.
,
1997
, “
A Simple Method for Predicting the Grounding Strength of Ships
,”
J. Ship Res.
,
41
, pp.
241
–
247
.
15.
Paik
,
J. K.
,
1994
, “
Cutting of a Longitudinally Stiffened Plate by a Wedge
,”
J. Ship Res.
,
38
, No.
4
, pp.
340
–
348
.
16.
Wierzbicki
,
T.
,
1995
, “
Concertina Tearing of Metal Plates
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
19
, pp.
2923
–
2943
.
17.
Terndrup Pedersen, P., and Zhang, S., 1998, “Absorbed Energy in Collision and Grounding,” Department of Naval Architecture and Offshore Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, submitted for publication, J. Ship Res.
18.
Simonsen
,
B. C.
,
1998
, “
Ship Grounding on Rock: 1—Theory
,”
Marine Struct.
,
10
, No.
7
, pp.
519
–
562
.
19.
Kuroiwa, T., 1996, “Numerical Simulation of Actual Collision and Grounding Accidents,” Int. Conf. Designs and Methodologies for Collision and Grounding Protection of Ships, San Francisco, SNAME, SNAJ, pp. 7.1–7.12.
20.
Card
,
J. C.
,
1975
, “
Effectiveness of Double Bottoms in Preventing Oil Outflow From Tanker Bottom Damage Incidents
,”
Mar. Technol. Soc. J.
,
12
,
No. 1
No. 1
.
21.
Minorsky
,
V. U.
,
1959
, “
An Analysis of Ship Collisions With Reference to Protection of Nuclear Power Plants
,”
J. Ship Res.
,
3
, pp.
1
–
4
.
22.
Terndrup Pedersen
,
P.
, and
Zhang
,
S.
,
2000
, “
Effect of Ship Structure and Size on Grounding and Collision Damage Distributions
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
27
, pp.
1161
–
1179
.
23.
IMO, 1995, Interim Guidelines for Approval of Alternative Methods of Design and Construction of Oil Tankers under Regulation 13F(5) of Annex I of MARPOL 73/78, Technical Report, Resolution MEPC.66 (37), Sep.
Copyright © 2000
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.