1-20 of 54809
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Article Type: Research-Article
J. Heat Transfer. December 2022, 144(12): 122801.
Paper No: HT-22-1033
Published Online: September 21, 2022
Journal Articles
Image
View factor between differential areas
Published Online: September 21, 2022
Fig. 1 View factor between differential areas More
Image
Vectors used in the formulation of the view factor expression, Eq.  (2) .
Published Online: September 21, 2022
Fig. 2 Vectors used in the formulation of the view factor expression, Eq. (2) . More
Image
Configuration VF_2 using QM_H and MC_H
Published Online: September 21, 2022
Fig. 3 Configuration VF_2 using QM_H and MC_H More
Image
Relative error for VF_1, using ( a ) MC_RT, ( b ) QM_RT, ( c ) MC_NI, and (...
Published Online: September 21, 2022
Fig. 4 Relative error for VF_1, using ( a ) MC_RT, ( b ) QM_RT, ( c ) MC_NI, and ( d ) QM_NI for z/L  =   0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 1, 2, and 10 More
Image
View factor VF_1 versus  z/L  using MC_RT with 100 rays and MC_NI and QM_NI...
Published Online: September 21, 2022
Fig. 5 View factor VF_1 versus z/L using MC_RT with 100 rays and MC_NI and QM_NI with equivalent run-times to MC_RT More
Image
Relative error for VF_2, using MC_RT, for  φ  = 30 deg, 60 deg, 90 deg, 120...
Published Online: September 21, 2022
Fig. 6 Relative error for VF_2, using MC_RT, for φ  = 30 deg, 60 deg, 90 deg, 120 deg, and 150 deg More
Image
Relative error for VF_2, using MC_RT, QM_RT, MC_NI, and QM_NI for  φ  = 30 ...
Published Online: September 21, 2022
Fig. 7 Relative error for VF_2, using MC_RT, QM_RT, MC_NI, and QM_NI for φ  = 30 deg More
Image
The relative error and work-error parameter for VF_2,  φ  = 90 deg,  N  sam...
Published Online: September 21, 2022
Fig. 8 The relative error and work-error parameter for VF_2, φ  = 90 deg, N sample  = 1000 for ( a ) Monte Carlo methods and ( b ) quasi-Monte Carlo methods More
Image
Curve fit for optimal  X  hybrid  versus  φ  for VF_2, ( a ) using MC_H and...
Published Online: September 21, 2022
Fig. 9 Curve fit for optimal X hybrid versus φ for VF_2, ( a ) using MC_H and ( b ) using QM_H More
Image
Relative error curves for VF_2, ( a ) using MC_H and ( b ) using QM_H
Published Online: September 21, 2022
Fig. 10 Relative error curves for VF_2, ( a ) using MC_H and ( b ) using QM_H More
Image
Speed-up for calculating VF_2 versus angle of orientation to achieve a 1% r...
Published Online: September 21, 2022
Fig. 11 Speed-up for calculating VF_2 versus angle of orientation to achieve a 1% relative error using QM_RT, MC_H, and QM_H More
Image
Configuration VF_3 using QM_H and MC_H
Published Online: September 21, 2022
Fig. 12 Configuration VF_3 using QM_H and MC_H More
Image
View factor versus orientation for VF_3 based on MC_RT with 1000 traced ray...
Published Online: September 21, 2022
Fig. 13 View factor versus orientation for VF_3 based on MC_RT with 1000 traced rays or equivalent using ( a ) Monte Carlo methods and ( b ) quasi-Monte Carlo methods More
Image
Speed-up for calculating VF_3 versus angle of orientation to achieve a 1% r...
Published Online: September 21, 2022
Fig. 14 Speed-up for calculating VF_3 versus angle of orientation to achieve a 1% relative error More
Image
Schematic diagram for ( a ) the configuration of an anode-supported MOLB-ty...
Published Online: September 21, 2022
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram for ( a ) the configuration of an anode-supported MOLB-type SOFC and ( b ) cross section of the x – y plane More
Image
Comparison of simulation results with the experimental results [ 30 ] at 10...
Published Online: September 21, 2022
Fig. 2 Comparison of simulation results with the experimental results [ 30 ] at 1073 K More
Image
Hydrogen molar fraction distribution in the cross section of  z  = 0.04 m a...
Published Online: September 21, 2022
Fig. 3 Hydrogen molar fraction distribution in the cross section of z  = 0.04 m at different rib widths when V cell =0.65 V: ( a ) Case 1 (Rib width 1.0 mm), ( b ) Case 2 (Rib width 1.3 mm), ( c ) Case 3 (Rib width 1.6 mm), and ( d ) Case 4 (Rib width 1.9 mm) More