Augments are a common solution for treating bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and industry is providing to surgeons several options, in terms of material, thickness, and shapes. Actually, while the choice of the shape and the thickness is mainly dictated by the bone defect, no proper guidelines are currently available to select the optimal material for a specific clinical situation. Nevertheless, different materials could induce different bone responses and, later, potentially compromise implant stability and performances. Therefore, in this study, a biomechanical analysis is performed by means of finite element modeling about existing features for augment designs. Based upon a review of available products at present, the following augments features were analyzed: position (distal/proximal and posterior), thickness (5, 10, and 15 mm), and material (bone cement, porous metal, and solid metal). For all analyzed configurations, bone stresses were investigated in different regions and compared among all configurations and the control model for which no augments were used. Results show that the use of any kind of augment usually induces a change in bone stresses, especially in the region close to the bone cut. The porous metal presents result very close to cement ones; thus, it could be considered as a good alternative for defects of any size. Solid metal has the least satisfying results inducing the highest changes in bone stress. The results of this study demonstrate that material stiffness of the augment should be as close as possible to bone properties for allowing the best implant performances.
Biomechanical Analysis of Augments in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
Manuscript received February 9, 2018; final manuscript received July 19, 2018; published online August 20, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Anna Pandolfi.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Innocenti, B., Fekete, G., and Pianigiani, S. (August 20, 2018). "Biomechanical Analysis of Augments in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty." ASME. J Biomech Eng. November 2018; 140(11): 111006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040966
Download citation file: