Modeling the mechanical response of the brain has become increasingly important over the past decades. Although mechanical stimuli to the brain are small under physiological conditions, mechanics plays a significant role under pathological conditions including brain development, brain injury, and brain surgery. Well calibrated and validated constitutive models for brain tissue are essential to accurately simulate these phenomena. A variety of constitutive models have been proposed over the past three decades, but no general consensus on these models exists. Here, we provide a comprehensive and structured overview of state-of-the-art modeling of the brain tissue. We categorize the different features of existing models into time-independent, time-dependent, and history-dependent contributions. To model the time-independent, elastic behavior of the brain tissue, most existing models adopt a hyperelastic approach. To model the time-dependent response, most models either use a convolution integral approach or a multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient. We evaluate existing constitutive models by their physical motivation and their practical relevance. Our comparison suggests that the classical Ogden model is a well-suited phenomenological model to characterize the time-independent behavior of the brain tissue. However, no consensus exists for mechanistic, physics-based models, neither for the time-independent nor for the time-dependent response. We anticipate that this review will provide useful guidelines for selecting the appropriate constitutive model for a specific application and for refining, calibrating, and validating future models that will help us to better understand the mechanical behavior of the human brain.