A Simple Treatment of Constraint Forces and Constraint Moments in the Dynamics of Rigid Bodies

[+] Author and Article Information
Oliver M. O'Reilly

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of California at Berkeley,
Berkeley, CA 94720-1740
e-mail: oreilly@berkeley.edu

Arun R. Srinivasa

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843-3123
e-mail: asrinivasa@tamu.edu

For example, the Boltzmann-Hamel equations, the Gibbs-Appell equations or Kane's equations [2,5-7].

Notable discussions on constraint forces in systems of particles in analytical mechanics include Gantmacher [8] and Planck [9], however, apart from Refs. [10-12], discussions of constraint (or reaction) moments are notably absent from textbooks.

An example of such a calculation can be found in Ref. [20].

This identification ensures that Lagrange's equations of motion (34) are equivalent to the Newton-Euler balance laws F=mv¯· and M=H· where H is the angular momentum of the rigid body of mass m relative to X¯ (see, e.g., Refs. [2], [11], [24], and [25] for further details on the equivalence).

With relation to other treatments of constraint forces, it is easy to observe from Eqs. (27) and (39) that the combined virtual work of Fc and Mc will be zero as expected.

Manuscript received March 1, 2014; final manuscript received July 17, 2014; published online August 25, 2014. Editor: Harry Dankowicz.

Appl. Mech. Rev 67(1), 014801 (Aug 25, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: AMR-14-1028; doi: 10.1115/1.4028099 History: Received March 01, 2014; Accepted July 17, 2014; Revised July 17, 2014

In this expository article, a simple concise treatment of Lagrange's prescription for constraint forces and constraint moments in the dynamics of rigid bodies is presented. The treatment is suited to both Newton–Euler and Lagrangian treatments of rigid body dynamics and is illuminated with a range of examples from classical mechanics and orthopedic biomechanics.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Lagrange, J. L., 1997, Analytical Mechanics (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science), Vol. 191, Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht [Translated from the 1811 French original, with an introduction and edited by A., Boissonnade, and V. N., Vagliente, and with a preface by C. G., Fraser].
Baruh, H., 1999, Analytical Dynamics, McGraw-Hill, Boston.
Papastavridis, J. G., 2002, Analytical Mechanics: A Comprehensive Treatise on the Dynamics of Constrained Systems; for Engineers, Physicists, and Mathematicians, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Synge, J. L., and Griffith, B. A., 1959, Principles of Mechanics, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Kane, T. R., Likins, P. W., and Levinson, D. A., 1983, Spacecraft Dynamics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Papastavridis, J. G., 1998, “Panoramic Overview of the Principles and Equations of Motion of Advanced Engineering Dynamics,” ASME Appl. Mech. Rev., 51(4), pp. 239–265. [CrossRef]
Udwadia, F. E., and Kalaba, R. E., 1996, Analytical Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Gantmacher, F., 1970, Lectures in Analytical Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, Moscow [Translated from the Russian by G. Yankovsky].
Planck, M., 1949, Introduction to Theoretical Physics (General Mechanics), Vol. 1, The McMillan Company, New York [Translated from the German by Henry L. Brose].
Huston, R. L., 1990, Multibody Dynamics, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston.
O'Reilly, O. M., 2008, Intermediate Engineering Dynamics: A Unified Approach to Newton-Euler and Lagrangian Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Shabana, A. A., 2001, Computational Dynamics, 2nd ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York.
Casey, J., and O'Reilly, O. M., 2006, “Geometrical Derivation of Lagrange's Equations for a System of Rigid Bodies,” Math. Mech. Solids, 11(4), pp. 401–422. [CrossRef]
O'Reilly, O. M., 2007, “The Dual Euler Basis: Constraints, Potentials, and Lagrange's Equations in Rigid Body Dynamics,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 74(2), pp. 256–258. [CrossRef]
O'Reilly, O. M., and Srinivasa, A. R., 2002, “On Potential Energies and Constraints in the Dynamics of Rigid Bodies and Particles,” Math. Prob. Eng., 8(3), pp. 169–180. [CrossRef]
Shuster, M. D., 1993, “A Survey of Attitude Representations,” J. Astronaut. Sci., 41(4), pp. 439–517.
Desroches, G., Chèze, L., and Dumas, R., 2010, “Expression of Joint Moment in the Joint Coordinate System,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 132(11), p. 114503. [CrossRef]
O'Reilly, O. M., Sena, M., Feeley, B. T., and Lotz, J. C., 2013, “On Representations for Joint Moments Using a Joint Coordinate System,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 135(11), p. 114504. [CrossRef]
O'Reilly, O. M., and Srinivasa, A. R., 2001, “On a Decomposition of Generalized Constraint Forces,” Proc. R. Soc., London, Ser. A, 457(2010), pp. 1307–1313 and 3052. [CrossRef]
O'Reilly, O. M., 2010, Engineering Dynamics: A Primer, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, New York.
Kessler, P., and O'Reilly, O. M., 2002, “The Ringing of Euler's Disk,” Regul. Chaotic Dyn., 7(1), pp. 49–60. [CrossRef]
Le Saux, C., Leine, R. I., and Glocker, C., 2005, “Dynamics of a Rolling Disk in the Presence of Dry Friction,” J. Nonlinear Sci., 15(1), pp. 27–61. [CrossRef]
Leine, R., 2009, “Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of the Energy Dissipation of a Rolling Disk During Its Final Stage of Motion,” Arch. Appl. Mech., 79(11), pp. 1063–1082. [CrossRef]
Casey, J., 1995, “On the Advantages of a Geometrical Viewpoint in the Derivation of Lagrange's Equations for a Rigid Continuum,” Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 46(Special Issue 1995), pp. S805–S847. [CrossRef]
Fox, E., 1967, Mechanics, Harper & Row, New York, Evanston, London.
Dankowicz, H., 1998, Mechanics Problems, and Their Solutions, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.
Fried, E., 2010, “New Insights Into the Classical Mechanics of Particle Systems,” Discrete Continuous Dyn. Syst., 28(4), pp. 1469–1504. [CrossRef]
Moon, F. C., 2008, Applied Dynamics With Applications to Multibody and Mechatronic Systems, 2nd ed., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany.
Noll, W., 2004, “On Material-Frame Indifference,” Five Contributions to Natural Philosophy, Department of Mathematics, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, Chap. 2, pp. 13–22.
Grood, E. S., and Suntay, W. J., 1983, “A Joint Coordinate System for the Clinical Description of Three-Dimensional Motions: Application to the Knee,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 105(2), pp. 136–144. [CrossRef]
Gauss, C. F., 2009, “Üher ein neues allgemeines Grundgesetz der Mechanik,” Crelle J. Reine Angew. Math., 1829(4), pp. 232–235. [CrossRef]
Cardin, F., and Favretti, M., 1996, “On Nonholonomic and Vakonomic Dynamics of Mechanical Systems With Nonintegrable Constraints,” J. Geom. Phys., 18(4), pp. 295–325. [CrossRef]
Lewis, A. D., and Murray, R. M., 1995, “Variational Principles for Constrained Systems: Theory and Experiment,” Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 30(6), pp. 793–815. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

A circular disk of radius R moving on a horizontal plane. The position vector of the instantaneous point of contact XP of the disk and the plane relative to the center of mass X¯ of the disk is always along e2". A set of 3-1-3 Euler angles are used to parameterize the rotation of the disk.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

A rigid body rotating in a plane about a fixed point XA. The constraint force Fc and constraint moment Mc, which ensure that the point XA remains fixed and the axis of rotation is constrained to be E3 by a revolute joint at XA, respectively, are also shown.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

A cylinder sliding on a smooth horizontal surface. The constraint force Fc and constraint moment Mc, which ensure that the center of mass X¯ moves in the horizontal plane and the cylinder does not rotate into the plane, respectively, are also shown.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

A rigid body rolling without slipping on a rough horizontal plane. The constraint force Fc acting at the instantaneous point of contact XP (where vP = 0) can be decomposed into a normal force N and friction force Ff: Fc = N + Ff.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

A whirling rigid body. The constraint force Fc and constraint moment Mc are also shown.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Equipollence of (a) a constraint force Fc acting at XC and a constraint moment Mc = λhC and (b) the same force acting at XA and a different constraint moment M = λhC + (xC-xA) × Fc

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Schematic of the right knee joint showing the proximal {p1,p2,p3} and distal {d1,d2,d3} bases which corotate with the femur and tibia, respectively. The Euler and dual Euler basis vectors associated with the rotation of this joint and the condyles C and D are also shown. This figure is adapted from Ref. [18].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Schematic of the normal forces at the condyles. For the illustrated case θ < 0. This figure is adapted from Ref. [18].




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In